Tinotenda Kanengoni Compare and contrast the Functionalist and Interactionist perspectives to conflict [25 marks] Conflict is either positive or negative. However people assume that conflict is always negative. People inherently are different, and conflict simply happens those differences come to light. Equipped with a conflict management process, people can explore and understand those differences, and use them to interact in a more positive, productive way.
Hardison Certified Educator The sociological functionalist perspective one of three main perspectives describes society as a system of interconnected parts working together to create a harmonious stable society.
Each system institution--family, church, education, economics, etc--adds to the equilibrium of the whole system. Within this functionalist social system there may also be dysfunction. A key feature of this duality is that a dysfunctional system, such as crime, may also be functional in that it heightens awareness of shared The sociological functionalist perspective one of three main perspectives describes society as a system of interconnected parts working together to create a harmonious stable society.
A key feature of this duality is that a dysfunctional system, such as crime, may also be functional in that it heightens awareness of shared values and shared bonds within society. Functions in this system may be of two types: Manifest functions are those that were planned and intended.
Latent functions are those that are unintended and perhaps hidden. For example, one system is an economy with a manifest function of organizing work, goods and capital and a latent function of defining the distribution of wealth. The sociological conflict perspective opposes the functionalist perspective in that it describes society as a system wherein different sectors compete for power and resources, with one set of groups and interests dominating other sets of groups and interests.
Conflict perspective is traced to the works of Karl Marx who saw the historic, economic stages society goes through as leading to deepening divisions between those who hold the means of production and those who are put to work by them to earn wages for their labor.
These two perspectives are very different from each other. One looks for harmony and equilibrium, while the other sees conflict, inequality and domination.Conflict theory highlights the control of the economy by the economic elite, the alienation of work, and various problems in the workplace.
Symbolic interactionism focuses on interaction in the workplace and how workers perceive many aspects of their work and workplace interaction. A Comparison of Marxist and Functionalist Understanding of the Role of Education in Society Functionalist theories assume the different parts of a society each have their own role to play (their own "function"), and work together smoothly in order to form a harmonious whole (macro).
A sociological viewpoint that argues that social inequality is necessary for the survival of any society or for any small or large organization. It is argued that without this inequality, division of labour would be difficult (not everyone can be team captain). Gender inequality is the major source in inequality in society.
People act on the basis of the interpreted meanings attached to interaction with others.
None of the above exemplifies the functionalist theory. A Comparison of Functionalism and Conflict Theory Both perspectives can be viewed as two faces of the same society.
For example, one of the basic problems facing a nonwhite individual in the functional model is that of high alienation and loss of identity. critiquing and expanding the sociology of inequality: comparing functionalist, conflict, and interactionist perspectives page 2 critiquing and expanding the sociology of inequality: comparing functionalist, conflict, and interactionist perspectives the conventional wisdom in sociology, at least as expressed in the.